You are a foreigner using a foreign language.
If you have a job and use document's, then you should understand them documents, and all of its implications of that document, otherwise, you would have no idea if you were to be mislead or not.
I do not understand your legal documents, what i understand is what i write or speak and i don't write or speak in legal anything.
Do YOU understand legal-legalese documents, they are gobbledegook, nonsence, no.sense.
Unless you understand legal documents in full, how can you ever begin to understand a word it says, you can't, then how can you ever enforce anything you don't fully understand yourself, you can't, that is ilegal. Unless you are fully aware of the foreign language, aware of creating the document in legalise yourself, you cannot ever claim to know the legalise document at all or use it, you can never use that document, it is invalid, to me, you and everyone. Anything legal-legalise is void, it has not force at all, to anyone.
Example:
Legal-legalese document - gobbledegook
cbnvgf b, htrdcgh, fgdfddhv
fgcdtrhbvbnbhjguygubjhbyigy.
gfcfdtrfy
signed.......... Mr or Mrs gobbledegook
==========================================
ordinary language
what a day outside, i hope it stays like this.
==========================================
If you understand legal-legalese, gobbledegook, then you will fully understand the consequences of your own actions, why you did this and why you did that. FULLY LIABLE, in what you do.
Conclusion
It all comes down to, YOU wanted to do your job, and get paid for what you do, no matter all the consequences, but not wanting to understand legal or legalese. YOU did things because, you wanted to do them or you liked too do them. YOU had a free will to do what YOU wanted, and still have, noone put you in a corner unless you wanted to be put there.
==========================================
Nuremberg Principle: Those who claimed they were “just following orders” or “just doing my job” were hanged.
==========================================
If someone wrote a book, and TEXT for documents, then YOU wrote a book, and TEXT for your documents, is that first book or TEXT of documents, yours? NO.
