Saturday 28 September 2013

Statuta de Mercatoribus (Statutes of Merchants)

Original Article: "Medieval Sourcebook"  http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/1283stat-merchants.asp

Medieval Sourcebook: 
Statuta de Mercatoribus (Statutes of Merchants), 11 Edw. I (1283) & 13 Edw. I (1285). 

[Arkenberg Introduction] 

The 1283 Statute of Acton Burnell, provided for the protection of creditors by the enrollment of debts in London, York, Bristol, Lincoln, Winchester, and Shrewsbury.  It provided that if the debtor failed to pay on the date due, the mayor of any of these six towns, would, with the help of the local sheriff, seize and sell the debtor's goods to the value of the debt.  If the debtor had no goods at that place, a writ from Chancery would issue to the mayor and sheriff of the place where the debtor had his or her goods, in order to seize and sell such goods to pay the obligation.  If the debtor had no goods, the debtor would suffer imprisonment until he or his friends paid the debt.  But the statute proved unworkable almost from the start, as many sheriffs and officials apparently refused to implement the terms of the statute, as stated in the preamble to the subsequent Statute of Merchants.  This latter instrument, promulgated in 1285, both reiterated and superseded Acton Burnell.  Now debt registration spread to many towns, and seizure and sale of the debtor's goods no longer served as the creditor's first resort.  Instead of first trying to get the mayor and sheriff to seize and sell the debtor's goods, the creditor could immediately have the debtor seized and incarcerated.  If the debtor then refused to pay the debt, a creditor could get a writ for the seizure and sale of the still imprisoned debtor's goods and lands, up to the value of the debt.  Like Acton Burnell, Merchants provided that no writ of debt might abate, and the courts would not be estopped from taking recognizances of debts, in the manner provided by the Law MerchantActon Burnell thus regularized the heretofore informal and hence irregular mercantile practice of recognizances throughout the realm.  Yet, Merchants reiterated this provision and authorized enrolling recognizances at fair courts.  The Statute of Merchants, an important statute, thus appears in a little over half of all Common Law statute books produced through the mid-fourteenth century, most frequently in books written in the second quarter of the fourteenth century.  Yet, Acton Burnell, despite its quick supersession, nonetheless appears in a little over a quarter of all Common Law statute books written through 1350, even as late as the fourteenth century's second quarter.  For it seems that not only merchants, but soon non-merchant creditors took advantage of these provisions. Indeed, so many non-merchant creditors required their non-merchant debtors to enroll their debts, often quite petty ones of half-pennies and farthings, that Chapter 33 of the New Ordinances restricted Acton Burnell to recognizances made between merchants for their merchandise (See also: M. M. Postan, "Private Financial Instruments in Medieval England," in his Medieval Trade and Finance (Cambridge, 1973), pp. 37-38; T.F.T. Plucknett, Legislation of Edward I:  The Ford Lectures Delivered in the University of Oxford in Hilary Term 1947, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1949), pp. 140-142).   Statute of Acton Burnell, 11 Edw. I (1283)Forasmuch as merchants, which heretofore have lent their goods to divers persons, be greatly impoverished, because there is no speedy law provided for them to have recovery of their debts at the day of payment assigned; and by reason hereof many merchants do refrain to come into this Realm with their merchandises, to the damage as well of the merchants, as of the whole realm: the King by himself and by his Council has ordained and established, that the merchant which will be sure of his debt, shall cause his debtor to come before the Mayor of London, or of York, or Bristol, or before the Mayor and a clerk, which the King shall appoint for the same, for to acknowledge the debt and the day of payment; and the recognizance shall be entered into a roll with the hand of the said clerk, which shall be known.  Moreover, the said clerk shall make with his own hand a Bill Obligatory, whereunto the seal of the debtor shall be put, with the king=s seal, that shall be provided for the same purpose, the which seal shall remain in the keeping of the mayor and clerk aforesaid; and if the debtor does not pay at the day to him limited, the creditor may come before the said Mayor and clerk with his Bill Obligatory; and if it be found by the roll, and by the Bill, that the debt was acknowledged, and that the day of payment is expired, the Mayor shall incontinent cause the moveables of the debtor to be sold, as far as the debt does amount to, by the appraisal of honest men, as also chattels, and burgages devisable, until the whole sum of the debt be reached; and the money, without delay, shall be paid to the Creditor.  And if the Mayor can find no buyer, he shall cause the moveables to be delivered to the Creditor at a reasonable price, as much as does amount to the sum of the debt, in allowance of his debt: and the king=s seal shall be put unto the sale and deliverance of the burgages devisable for a perpetual witness.  And if the debtor have no moveables within the jurisdiction of the Mayor, whereupon the debt may be levied, but has some otherwhere within the Realm, then shall the Mayor send the Recognizance, made before him and the clerk aforesaid, unto the Chancellor, under the King=s seal, and the Chancellor shall direct a writ unto the sheriff, in whose bailiwick the moveables of the debtor be, and the sheriff shall cause him to agree with his Creditor, in such form as the Mayor should have done in case that the moveables of the debtor had been within his power; and let them that shall appraise the moveable goods, to be delivered unto the Creditor, take good heed that they do set a reasonable price upon them, for if they do set an over high price for favor born to the Debtor, and to the damage of the Creditor, then shall the Thing so appraised be delivered unto themselves at such price as they have limited, and they shall forthwith be answerable unto the Creditor for his debt.  
And if the debtor will say, that his moveable goods were delivered or sold for less than they were worth, yet shall he have no remedy thereby; for when the Mayor or the sheriff has sold the moveable goods lawfully to him that offered most, he may blame himself that before the day of the debt coming due he had it in his power to have sold his moveable goods, and to have levied the money with his own hand, and yet he would not.  And if the Debtor have no moveables whereupon the debt may be levied, then shall his body be taken where it may be found, and kept in prison until that he have made agreement, or his friends for him; and if he have not wherewith he may sustain himself in prison, the Creditor shall find him bread and water, to the end that he die not in prison for default of sustenance, the which costs the debtor shall recompense him with his debt, before that he be let out of prison.  And if the Creditor be a Merchant Stranger, he shall remain at the costs of the Debtor for so long time as he tarries about the suit of his debt, and until the moveable goods of the debtor be sold or delivered unto him.  And if the Creditor do not take the debtor alone for the surety of his payment, by reason whereof pledges or mainpernors be found, then those pledges or mainpernors shall come before the Mayor and clerk abovesaid, and shall bind themselves by writings and recognizances, as aforesaid of the debtor.  And in like manner if the debt be not paid at the day limited, such execution shall be awarded against the pledges or mainpernors, as before is said of the debtor, provided, nonetheless, that so long as the debt may be fully taken and levied of the goods moveable of the debtor, the mainpernors or pledges shall be without damage: notwithstanding, for default of moveable goods of the debtor, the Creditor shall have execution of his recognizance upon the mainpernors or pledges, in such manner and form as before is limited against the principal debtor.  And to defray the charge of the aforesaid clerk, the King shall take out of every Pound one penny.  This Ordinance and Act the King wills to be holden from henceforth throughout all his realm of England, among all persons whosoever they may be, who shall freely choose to make such recognizance; except Jews, to whom this statute does not extend.  And by this statute a Writ of Debt shall not be abated.  And the Chancellor, Barons of the Exchequer, Justices of the one bench and of the other, and Justices in Eyre, shall not be estopped to take Recognizances of Debts of those who shall choose to do so before them; but the Execution of Recognizances before them shall not be made according to the form aforesaid, but according to the law, usage, and manner heretofore used.  Given at Acton Burnell, the twelfth day of October in the eleventh year of our Reign.   Like Statutes have the Mayors of York and Bristol, Lincoln and Winchester, and ShrewsburyThe Statute of Merchants, 13 Edw. I (1285): Forasmuch as Merchants, which heretofore have lent their Goods to divers persons, be fallen in poverty, because there is no speedy remedy provided, whereby they may shortly recover their debt at the day of payment; and for this cause, many merchants do refrain to come into the realm with their merchandise, to the damage of such merchants and of all the realm; the King and his Council at his Parliament held at Acton Burnell, after the Feast of St. Michael, the eleventh year of his reign, has ordained these establishments thereupon for the remedy of such merchants; which ordinances and establishments the King commands that they shall be firmly kept and observed throughout this Realm, whereby merchants may have remedy and less trouble and business to recover their debts, than they have had heretofore: But forasmuch as merchants after complained unto the King, that sheriffs misinterpreted his statutes, and sometimes by malice and false interpretation delayed the execution of the statute, to the great damage of merchants; the King at his Parliament held at Westminster after Easter, the thirteenth year of his reign, caused the said Statute made at Acton Burnell to be rehearsed; and for the declaration of certain articles in the statute aforesaid, has ordained and established that a merchant who will be sure of his debt, shall cause his debtor to come before the Mayor of London, or before some chief warden of a city or of another good town, where the King shall appoint; and before the Mayor and chief Warden, or other sufficient men chosen and sworn thereto, when the Mayor or chief Warden cannot attend, and before one of the clerks, that the King shall thereto assign, when both cannot attend, he shall acknowledge the debt and the day of payment; and the recognizance shall be enrolled by one of the clerks= hands being known, and the Roll shall be double, whereof one part shall remain with the Mayor or chief Warden and the other with the Clerks, that thereto shall be first named; and further, one of the said clerks with his own hand shall write an obligation, to which writing the seal of the debtor shall be put with the King=s seal, provided for the same intent; which seal shall be of two pieces, whereof the greater piece shall remain in the custody of the mayor or chief warden, and the other piece in the keeping of the foresaid clerk

And if the debtor do not pay at the Day of Payment limited unto him, then shall the Merchant come to the Mayor and clerk with his obligation; and if it be found by the Roll or writing, that the debt was acknowledged, and the day of payment expired, the Mayor or chief warden shall cause the body of the debtor to be taken, if he be Lay, whensoever he happens to come into their power, and shall commit him to the prison of the town, if there be any, and he shall remain there at his own costs until he has agreed for the debt.  And it is commanded that the Keeper of the Town Prison shall retain him upon the delivery of the mayor or warden; and if the Keeper shall not receive him, he shall be answerable for the debt, if he have whereof; and if he have not whereof, he that committed the prison to his keeping shall answer.  And if the debtor cannot be found in the power of the mayor or chief warden, then shall the mayor or chief warden send unto the Chancery, under the king=s seal, the recognizance of the debt; and the Chancellor shall direct a writ unto the sheriff in whose shire the debtor shall be found, for to take his body, if he be Lay, and safely to keep him in prison until he has agreed for the debt; and within a quarter of a year after that he is taken, his Chattels shall be delivered him, so that by his own he may levy and pay the debt; and it shall be lawful unto him, during the same quarter, to sell his lands and tenements for the discharge of his debts, and his sale shall be good and effectual.  

And if he do not agree within the quarter next after the quarter expired, all the lands and goods of the debtor shall be delivered unto the merchant by a reasonable extent, to hold them until such time as the debt is wholly levied; and nevertheless the body shall remain in prison as before is said; and the merchant shall find him bread and water; and the merchant shall have such seisin in the lands and tenements delivered unto him, or his assignee, that he may maintain a writ of novel disseisin, if he be put out, and re-disseisin also, as of freehold, to hold to him and his assigns until the debt be paid; and as soon as the debt is levied the body of the debtor shall be delivered with his lands.  And in such writs as the Chancellor does award mention shall be made, that the sheriff shall certify the justices of the one bench or of the other, how he has performed the King=s Commandment, at a certain day; at which day the merchant shall sue before the justices, if agreement be not made; and if the sheriffs do not return the writ, or do return that the writ came too late, or that he has directed it to the bailiffs of some franchise, the justices shall do as it is contained in the latter statute of Westminster.  And if in case the sheriff return that the debtor cannot be found, or that he is a Cleric, the merchant shall have writs to all the sheriffs where he shall have land, and that they shall deliver unto him all the goods and lands of the debtor by a reasonable extent, to hold unto him and his assigns in the form aforesaid; and at the last he shall have a writ to what sheriff he will, to take his body, if he be Lay, and to retain it in manner aforesaid.  And let the keeper of the prison take heed, that he must answer for the Body or for the Debt.  And after the debtor=s lands be delivered to the merchant, the debtor may lawfully sell his land, so that the merchant have no damage of the Approvements.  And the merchants shall always be allowed for their damages and all costs, labors, suits, delays, and expenses reasonable.  And if the debtor find sureties, which do acknowledge themselves to be principal debtors, after the day passed, the sureties shall be ordered in all things as is said of the principal debtor, as to the arrest of the body, delivery of lands, and other things.  And when the lands of the debtors be delivered unto the merchant, he shall have seisin of all the lands that were in the hand of the debtor, the day of the recognizance made, in whose hands soever that they come after, either by feoffment or otherwise.  And after the debt paid, the debtor=s lands and the issues of lands of debtors by feoffment shall return again, as well to the feoffee, as the other lands unto the debtors.  And if the debtor or his sureties die, the merchant shall have no authority to take the Body of his Heir, but he shall have his lands, as before is said, if he be of age, or when he shall be of full age; until he has levied of the lands the amounts and value of the debt.  And a Seal shall be provided, that shall serve for Fairs, and the same shall be sent unto every Fair under the King=s seal by a clerk sworn, or by the Keeper of the Fair, and of the Commonalty of the merchants of the City of London two merchants shall be chosen, that shall swear, and the Seal shall be opened before them; and the one Piece shall be delivered unto the foresaid merchants, and the other shall remain with the clerk; and before them, or one of the merchants, if both cannot attend, the recognizances shall be taken, as before is said. 

And before that any recognizance be enrolled, the pain of the Statute shall be openly read before the debtor, so that after he cannot say that any did put another penalty than that whereto he bound himself.  And to maintain the costs of the said clerk, the King shall take of every Pound a penny, in every town where the Seal is, except Fairs, where he shall take one penny halfpenny of the Pound.  This Ordinance and Act the King wills to be observed from henceforth throughout his realm of England and Ireland, amongst the which people they that will may make such recognizances, except Jews to whom this Ordinance shall not extend.  And by this Statute a Writ of Debt shall not be abated; and the Chancellor, Justices of the one Bench and the other, the Barons of the Exchequer, and Justices Errant, shall not be estopped to take Recognizances of Debts before them acknowledged and made.  But the Execution of Recognizances made before them shall not be done in the Form aforesaid, but by the law and manner before used, and otherwise provided in other statutes.  The New Ordinances, 5 Edw. II (1311), c. 33 ("Of The Statute of Merchants"): Forasmuch as many persons, other than known merchants, do feel themselves much aggrieved and fined by the Statute of Merchants made at Acton Burnell; We do ordain, that henceforth that Statute shall not hold except between Merchants and Merchants, and of Merchandises made between them, and that the Recognizance be made like as is contained in the said Statute, and by the testimony of four good and lawful men, who are known, and that their names be entered in the Recognizance to testify the fact, and that to no one shall other lands be delivered, to hold in the name of Free Tenement by virtue of the said Statute, except the Burgages of Merchants and their moveable chattels, and that is to be understood between Merchants and Merchants, known MerchantsMoreover, We do ordain, that the Seals of the King which be assigned to testify the said Recognizances be delivered to the most rich and the most sage, in the undermentioned Towns, chosen to such custody by the Commonalties of the same Towns; that is to say, at Newcastle-upon-Tyne, York, and Nottingham, for the Counties beyond Trent, and the merchants there coming and abiding; at Exeter, Bristol, and Southampton for the Merchants coming to and abiding in parts of the South and West; at Lincoln and Northampton, for merchants there coming and abiding; at London and at Canterbury, for the merchants coming to and abiding in those parts; at Shrewsbury, for the merchants coming to and abiding in those parts; at Norwich, for the merchants coming to and abiding in those parts.  And Recognizances made elsewhere than in the said towns, shall not hold place from henceforth.

Blacks Law, 4th Edition - [PURSUANT TO]

     BOTH

         |       
Red and Black = Both

one or the other 
         |
Red or Black = one or the other

a mix, of both

        |
Red n' Black =mixture of both

                                     BOTH
                                          |
[Pursuant to] the [Births-->>and Deaths] Registration Act 1953

[pursuant to]:
agreeable to:
agreeing to:
commensurate with:
compatible to: 
connorming to:
consistent with: 
consonant with: 
in accord with:
in accordance with: 
in harmony with:

Blacks Law 4th Edition
[pursuant to]:

CONCERTED ACTION (or PLAN).  Action that has been planned, arranged, adjusted, agreed on and settled between parties acting together [pursuant to] some design or scheme.  State v. Jessup & Moore Paper Co., 4 Boyce (Del.) 248, 88 A. 449,
451; Rock Creek Oil Corporation v. Moore, Tex.
Civ.App., 41 S.W.2d 501, 504.

     ===========================================
CODE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
(B) This Disciplinary Rule does not prohibit payment to a former partner or associate [pursuant to] a separation or retirement agreement.
     ===========================================
EC 7-18 The legal system in its broadest sense functions best when persons in need of legal advice or assistance are represented by their own counsel.  For this reason a lawyer should not communicate on the subject matter of the representation of his client with a person he knows to be represented in the matter by a lawyer, unless [pursuant to] law or rule of court or unless he has the consent of the lawyer for that person.
     ===========================================
Closing up butcher shop with intention of giving up business and in removing all perishable merchandise, although tenant retained key and did not notify landlord of intention to vacate premises, held an "abandonment" and not a "surrender" of premises.  Schnitzer v. Lanzara, 115 N. J.L. 332, 18 A. 234. Refusal by lessee of lessor's offer to reconstruct burned building, Girard Trust Co. v. Tremblay
Motor Co., 291 Pa. 507, 140 A. 506, 512
.  But tenants surrendering premises [pursuant to] notice of forfeiture did
not "abandon" premises. Becker v. Rute, 228 Iowa 533,
293 N.W. 18, 21.

     ===========================================
Adding of interest or income of a fund to principal [pursuant to] provisions of a will or deed, preventing its being expended.  In re Watson's Will, 258 N.Y.S. 755, 144 Misc. 213.
     ===========================================
AJOURNMENT.  In French law, the document [pursuant to] which an action or suit is commenced, equivalent to the writ of summons in England. Actions, however, are in some cases commenced by requéte or petition. Arg.Fr.Merc.Law, 545.
     ===========================================
Bank of issue.  One which, [pursuant to] authority conferred by its charter, issues its own notes intended to circulate as money. Millikan v. Security Trust Co., 187 Ind. 307, 118 N.E. 568, 569.
     ===========================================
COMMANDEMENT.  In French law.  A writ served by the huissier [pursuant to] a judgment or to an executory notarial deed

Its object is to give notice to the debtor that if he does not pay
the sum to which he has been condemned by the judgment, or which he engaged to pay by the notarial deed, his property will be seized and sold. Arg.Fr.Merc.Law, 550.

     ===========================================
An incorporeal, political being, composed of one or more judges, who sit at fixed times and places, attended by proper officers, [pursuant to] lawful authority, for the administration of justice

State v. Le Blond, 108 Ohio  St.
126, 140 N.E. 510, 512
.  An organized body with defined powers, meeting at certain times and places for the hearing and decision of causes and other matters brought before it, and aided in this, its proper business, by Its proper officers, viz., attorneys and counsel to present and manage the business, clerks to record and attest its acts and decisions, and ministerial officers to execute its commands, and secure due order in its proceedings. Ex parte
Gardner, 22 Nev. 280, 39 P. 570; Hertzen v. Hertzen,  104
Or. 423, 208 P. 580, 582.

     ===========================================
COURT OF COMMISSIONERS OF SEWERS.The name of certain English courts created by commission under the great seal [pursuant to] the statute of sewers (23 Hen. VIII. c. 5).
     =========================================== 
In statutes the term has various special meanings, dependent upon context, purpose of statute, etc. Toof v. City Nat. Bank of Paducah, Ky., C.C.A.Ky., 206 F. 250, 252; a bank taking chattel mortgage for pre-existing debt. Lindig v. Johnson City State Bank, Tex.Com.App., 41 S.W.2d 222, 224.  An assignee of conditional seller taking trucks as creditor of purchaser, John W. Snyder, Inc., v. Aker, 134 Misc. 721, 236 N.Y.S. 28, 30.  One who had recovered verdict against principal on attachment bond, Amer
Realty Co. v. Spack, 280 Mass. 96, 181 N; E. 753, 754
; the receiver of an insolvent national bank suing to enforce statutory stockholder's liability for benefit of creditors as a "creditor", Coffey v. Fisher, C.C.A.Tenn., 100 F.2d 51, 33; person to whom letters of administration granted.  State ex rel. Gentry v. O' Byrne, 221 Ind. 282, 46 N.E.2d, 690.  One, seeking to recover from a special administrator for conversion, United States Fidelity & Guaranty
Co. v. Krow, 184 Okl. 444, 87 P.2d 950, 954
; holders of participation certificates in mortgage, In re R. A. Security Holdings, D.C.N.Y., 46 F.Supp. 254, 255; persons who seize property under a legal process. Neils v. Bohlsen, 181 Minn. 25, 231 N.W. 248; state and political subdivisions, to which the forfeit is payable, International Harvester Co. v. Gully, 188 Miss. 115, 194 So. 472, 473The National Labor Relations Board, seeking enforcement of a back pay allowance, National Labor Relations Board v. Killoren, C.C.A.Mo., 122 F.2d 609, 612.  The United States which filed for record, Underwood v. United States, D.C.Tex., 37 F.Supp. 824, 826.
 

The Reconstruction Finance Corporation, which had purchased over 86 per cent. of outstanding bonds of insolvent irrigation district, [pursuant to] plan to refinance entire bond indebtedness of district, West Coast Life Ins. Co. v.
Merced Irr, Dist., C.C.A.Cal., 114 F.2d 654, 668, 669
.

    ===========================================
Solvent debts.  In Pennsylvania, the "solvent debts" which a city may deduct from its gross indebtedness [pursuant to] Act April 20, 1874, P.L. 65, in ascertaining its borrowing capacity, are debts due it directly, payment of which it can enforce as one of its quick assets for the liquidation of any of its obligations. McGuire v. City of Philadelphia, 245 Pa. 287, 91 A. 622, 623.
     ===========================================
Express Common-Law Dedication
An "express common-law dedication" is one where the intent is expressly manifested, such as by ordinary deeds, recorded plats not executed [pursuant to] statute or defectively certified so as not to constitute a statutory dedication. Board of Com'rs of Garfield County v. Anderson, 167 Okl. 253, 29 P.2d 75, 78.

     ===========================================
A deed is distinguished from a contract in that a deed is a mere transfer of title to realty, and is the act of but one of the parties, made [pursuant to] a previous contract either in parol or in writingCollins v. Lyon, Inc., 181 Va. 230, 24 S.E.2d 572, 579

Accordingly; want of consideration of itself will not warrant setting aside a deed, though want of consideration would be good defense to an executory contractLawson v. Boo, 227 Iowa 100, 287 N.W. 282, 284.  However, a deed is a contract, for the purpose of reformation in equity to make it truly speak the legally ascertained intention of the parties. Sawyer Coal & Ice Co. v. Kinnett-Odom Co., 192 Ga. 166, 14 S.E.2d 879, 883.
     ===========================================
In Pleading
The statement of matter in a replication, rejoinder, or subsequent pleading, as a cause of action or defense, which is not [pursuant to] the previous pleading of the same party, and which does not support and fortify it.  2 Williams, Saund. 84a, note 1; 2 Wils. 98; Co.Litt. 304a; Hanna v. Royce, 119 Or. 450, 249 P. 173, 175.

     ===========================================
A departure occurs when party departs from cause or defense first made and has recourse to another.  Livingston v. Malever, 103 Fla. 200, 137 So. 113, 118; Clonts  v. State, 19 Ala.App. 130, 95 So. 562; Northwestern Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. Ward, 56 Okl. 188, 155 P. 524, 525; Burrell v. Masters, 65 Colo. 310, 176 P. 316, 317. Or, in other words, when the second pleading contains matter not [pursuant to] the former, and which does not support and fortify It.
 

Hence a departure obviously can never take place till the replication. Steph.Pl. 410.  Each subsequent pleading must pursue or support the former one; i.e., the replication must support the declaration, and the rejoinder the plea, without departing out of it. 

3 Bl.Comm. 310.  An amendment to a petition changing the cause of action is not, technically, a "departure." King v. Milner, 63 Colo. 407, 167 P. 957, 960; MacGerry v. Rodgers, 144 Wash. 375, 258 P. 314, 315.
    ===========================================
DISENTAILING DEED.  In English law.  An enrolled assurance barring an entail, [pursuant to] 3 & 4 Wm. IV. c. 74. 
     ===========================================
Cumulative Dividend
A dividend, usually preferred, which if not earned or paid, [pursuant to] agreement must be paid at some subsequent date. 


Lockwood v. General Abrasive Co., 205 N.Y.S. 511, 513, 210 App.Div. 141.
     ===========================================
General Election
One at which the officers to be elected are such as belong to the general government,—that is, the general and central political organization of the whole state; as distinguished from an election of officers for a particular locality only.  Also, one held for the selection of an officer after the expiration of the full term of the former officer; thus distinguished from a special election, which is one held to supply a vacancy in office occurring before the expiration of the full term for which the incumbent was elected


Downs v. State, 78 Md. 128, 26 A. 1005.  One that regularly recurs in each election precinct of the state on a day designated by law for the selection of officers, or is held in such entire territory [pursuant to] an enactment specifying a single day for the ratification or rejection of one or more measures submitted to the people by the Legislative Assembly, and not for the election of any officer. Bethune v. Funk, 166 P. 931, 932, 85 Or. 246.  One
that is held throughout the entire state or territory. Territory v. Ricordati, 18 N.M. 10, 132 P. 1139, 1140.  An election for the choice of a national, state, judicial, district, municipal, county,
or township official, required by law to be held regularly at a designated time, to fill a new office or a vacancy in an office at the expiration of the full term thereof. Eakle v. Board of Education of Independent School Dist. of Henry, 97 W.Va. 434, 125 S.E. 165, 168


In statutes, the term may include a primary election. Kelso v. Cook, 184 Ind. 173, 110 N.E. 987, 993, Ann.Cas.1918E, 68.
 

Contra, under a municipal charter, City Council of San Jose v. Goodwin, 196 Cal. 274, 237 P. 548, 549.  In Vermont, the term is used throughout the Public Statutes to designate what before had commonly been known as "freeman's meeting." Martin v. Fullam, 97 A. 442, 445, 90 Vt. 163.
     ===========================================
By the word "grant," in a treaty, is meant not only  a formal grant, but any concession, warrant, order, or permission to survey, possess, or settle, whether written or parol, express, or presumed from possession.  Such a grant may be made by law, as well as by a patent [pursuant to] a law. Strother v. Lucas, 12 Pet. 436, 9 L. Ed. 1137; Bryan v. Kennett, 113 U.S. 179, 5 S.Ct. 413, 28 L.Ed. 908; Hastings v. Turnpike Co., 9 Pick., Mass., 80; Dudley v. Sumner, 5 Mass. 470.
     ===========================================
INIURCOLLEGUIA. 
A body of Soviet lawyers in Moscow organized and constituted [pursuant to] statute under jurisdiction and control of the U. S. S. R. Ministry of Justice for the purpose of exclusive representation of Soviet nationals in foreign legal mattersIn re Mitzkel's Estate, 233 N.Y.S.2d 519, 524, 36 Misc.2d 671; In re Kapocius' Estate, 234 N.Y.S.2d 346, 348, 36 Misc.2d 1087.
     ============================================
JUDICIAL DIVORCE
One granted by the sentence of a court of justice, [pursuant to] general law. Maclay v. Maclay, 147 Fla. 77, 2 So.2d 361,
363
.

     ============================================
LIQUIDATING DISTRIBUTION
A distribution of stock [pursuant to] reorganization plan.  Dwor
sky v. Buzza Co., 215 Minn. 282, 9 N.W.2d 767, 769
.

     ============================================
MUTUAL WILLS
Those made as the separate wills of two people which are reciprocal in provision.  Child v. Smith, 225 Iowa 1205, 282 N.W. '316, 321.  'Or those executed [pursuant to] agreement or compact between two or more persons to dispose of their property in particular manner,' each in consideration of the other.  Maloney v. Rose, 224 Iowa 1071, 277 N.W. 572, 574.
     ============================================
To constitute an officer de facto it is not a necessary prerequisite that there shall have been an attempted exercise of competent prima facie power of appointment or election; a de facto officer being one whose title is not good in law, but who is in fact In the unobstructed possession of an office and is discharging its duties in full view of the public, in such manner and under such circumstances as not to present the appearance of being an intruder or usurper.  U. S. v. Royer, 45 S.Ct. 519, 520, 268 U.S. 394, 69
L.Ed. 1011
.  A person is a "de facto officer" where the duties of the officer are exercised-First, without a known appointment or election, but under such circumstances of reputation or acquiescence as were calculated to induce people, without inquiry, to submit to or invoke his action, supposing him to be the officer he assumed to be.  Second, under color of a known and valid appointment or election, but where the officer has failed to conform to some precedent requirement or condition, as to take an oath, give a bond, or the like.  Third, under color of a known election or appointment, void because the officer was not eligible, or because there was a want of power in the electing or appointing body, or by reason of some defect or irregularity in its exercise, such ineligibility, want of power, or defect being unknown to the public.  Fourth, under color of an election or appointment by or [pursuant to] a public unconstitutional law, before the same is adjudged to be such.  Wendt v. Berry, 154 Ky. 586, 157 S.W.
1115, 1118, 45 L.R.A.,N.S., 1101, Ann.Cas.1915C, 493
.

     ============================================
In English practice.  A statement in writing of some special matter submitted to the consideration of a chief clerk in the court of chancery, [pursuant to] an order made upon an application ex
parte
, or a decretal order of the court.  It is either for maintenance of an infant, appointment of a guardian, placing a ward of the court at the university or in the army, or apprentice to a trade; for the appointment of a receiver, the establishment of a charity, etc. Wharton.

     ============================================
PURSUANT
A following after or following out; line in accordance with or by reason of something; conformable; in accordance; agreeably, conformably; a carrying out or with effect, the act of executing; that which is [pursuant]; consequence; acting or done in consequence or in prosecution of anything; hence, agreeable. Suppiger v. Enking, 60 Idaho 292, 91 P.2d 362, 366.
     ============================================
General sessionsA court of record, in England, held by two or more justices of the peace, for the execution of the authority given them by the commission of the peace and certain statutes

General sessions held at certain times in the four quarters of the year [pursuant to] St. 2 Hen. V. are properly called "quarter sessions,"  (q. v.,) but intermediate general sessions may also be held. Sweet.
     ============================================
Statute-merchant.  In English law.  A security for a debt acknowledged to be due, entered into before the chief magistrate of some trading town, [pursuant to] the statute 13 Edw. IDe Mercatoribus, by which not only the body of the debtor might be imprisoned, and his goods seized in satisfaction of the debt, but also his lands might be delivered to the creditor till out of the rents
and profits of them the debt be satisfied.  2 Bl. Comm. 160.  Now fallen into disuse.  1 Steph. Comm. 287. See Yates v. People, 6 Johns. (N.Y.) 404.

     ============================================
That department of government which is charged with the receipt, custody, and disbursement ([pursuant to] appropriations) of the public revenues or funds.

Friday 27 September 2013

Controlled - You are taught to be, intelectual, have intellect. seek intellectual property - ALL NON-SENSE

Controlled 
You are taught to be: intellectual (NON-SENSE)
You are taught to have: intellect (NON-SENSE)
You are taught to seek: intellectual property (NON-SENSE)

All intellect is non-sense, its fiction, it only exists on paper. 
An intellectual, is not human or a living being. 
An intellect is a created add on to a human or a living, being

If i went here, if i when there, if i did this, if i did that, would i have intellectual idea's created for me, i.e. NON-SENSE. 

If you were not born with it, then it does not exist.

Fictional Legal System 

Fictional WORLD, full of dead corps 

The legal system deals in WORDS, NAMES And MONEY, if you are, one of these, NAMES, or part of these WORDS, then you are legally owned, by, these which were created, by others and not by you, if you use them, in any way, you are stealing their intellectual property, (their NON-SENSE), that’s why you pay for things, because they are charging you to use them.  It’s an object/instrument, just like a pebble on the beach, with patterns on it, or paper with patterns on it.  That’s all it is, MONEY is FICTIONAL.  You believe in it, then it exist, you stop believing in it, then it goes away, whoever does not want to use it, the FICTIONAL MONEY, they can.  FICTION only exist in the Legal Fiction system


Bringing paper to life, that is witchcraft-NECROMANCY, paper is dead, MONEY is dead, you believe in the dead, there are a lot of people who believe in bringing things to life.


Subscribing to someone else's intellectual, ideas and concepts.
Intellectual property's

Birth Certificate (PROOF OF FRAUD), Intellectual property (NOT YOURS), you didn't create the paper which the NAME is on, a gift give away, (REGISTERED), cannot be the same gift, given. 

Why can a gift given to you, be used against you, how is that a gift.



REGISTERED,
NAMES, 
Person or Persons, 
Citizen,
Republic,
Patriarch,
Intellectual (Intellect-NON-SENSE)
Estate, 
JOB-WORK,
Title, 
Rank, 
Judge, 
Attorney, 
Clerk (highest position in the courtroom), 
Society, 
Rights, 
Duties,
Religions,
Governments,
Artificial being, 
Corporations, 
Quasi-Corporations, 
Territorial Corporations, 
Foreign Corporations, 
Councils, 
Post Offices, 
School Education - pedagogy, 
Statutes, 
Law, 
Co. 
Taxation, 
Revenue,
FINANCE, 
Contracts, 
Slaves, 
Indians, 
Property,
Lords Day (Judge holding court)
Individuals, 
Infant, 
We The People (The Bankers).
UNITED KINGDOM
UK
UNITED states,
UNITED STATES,
UNITED NATIONS,
POLICE,
ARMY'S,

the list goes on and on....

Wednesday 25 September 2013

Sui iuris - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Original Article:  "Sui iuris" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sui_iuris

Sui iuris 

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 

Sui iuris, commonly also spelled sui juris (/ˈsuːaɪ ˈdʒʊərɪs/ or /ˈsuːi-/), is a Latin phrase which literally means "of one's own right".

ATTENTION: LAW/BY-LAW ENFORCEMENT, MILITARY etc. Did you know that?..........

Original Article: "ATTENTION: LAW/BY-LAW ENFORCEMENT, MILITARY etc. Did you know that?.......... "

ATTENTION: LAW/BY-LAW ENFORCEMENT, MILITARY etc. Did you know that?.......... 

1. You have oathed your living soul to a dead, fictional CORPORATION namely the CROWN CORPORATION, CITY OF LONDON, STATE and are, in fact, a FOREIGN COMBATANT and ENEMY OF THE STATE wherever you live outside of aforementioned "Square Mile"/CITY OF LONDON, STATE

2. By virtue of you claiming to be the NAME on the BIRTH CERTIFICATE, you are, in fact, committing FRAUD and furthermore, AIDING AND ABETTING/ENTICING INTO SLAVERY every living soul you demand a NAME from inasmuch as they too are committing FRAUD via COMMISSION/OMISSION of this fact through ignorance of it? 

3. You are, in fact, committing the CRIME of FALSE IMPERSONATION by wearing the very uniform of a FALSE IMPERSONATION separate from your true, living self? 

4. The very MASTERS you serve consider you "dogs" (dogtags ring a bell?) and will use you until your usefulness runs out and YOU become "collateral damage" like those that you kill, steal from, rape, entice into slavery etc. et al in the everyday "execution of your duties"

5. The very people you are being told are your enemy are actually the ones trying to awaken you and the rest of humanity to the crimes you are committing knowingly/unknowingly by/for your MASTERS where you are guaranteeing your own slavery inasmuch as the very NAME you think of as you is a DEAD, CORPORATE FICTION/BOND/CORPORATION that is the PROPERTY OF THE CROWN CORPORATION that renders you and all NON- TEMPLE B.A.R. MEMBERS/humanity D.O.A./DEAD ON ARRIVAL when you're/we're born? 

 6. That "I was just following orders" is not a DEFENCE from/of Universal Law whereby YOU are FULLY RESPONSIBLE/known by/for your actions of ALL injury you in-gage/in pledge in knowingly/unknowingly by/for COMMISSION/OMISSION of any/all CRIMES you perpetrate where, by virtue of your "UNCLEAN HANDS" STATUS, everything you do in the EXECUTION OF YOUR DUTIES is, in fact, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY

7. Inasmuch as YOU are not a TEMPLE B.A.R. (BRITISH ACCREDITED REGISTRY) MEMBER, YOU are like the rest of humanity where using/claiming/acting as the NAME REGISTERED to the CROWN CORPORATION and all the ORDERS you give/receive are, in fact, done so in FRAUD under FALSE IMPERSONATION which is a CAPITAL CRIME and every ACTION you partake in, you do so for the benefit of your fellow NON-B.A.R. MEMBER humanity such as family, friends, kin etc. who are as ENSLAVED as YOU where you are AIDING AND ABETTING in that ENTICEMENT TO SLAVERY which is a CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY.  Yes, you are the enablers of those that control YOU and the lives of your family and those of every family on the face of this Earth.  While the concepts may not be immediately visible, it is merely important to me to make YOU aware of your crimes of commission/omission where ignorance of these FACTS are known to you now rendering you WILFULLY CONSENTING where ignorance isn’t, never was nor ever will be a position of defense.  Every act you continue to do make you the “undertakers” of Humanity, as a whole.  Every ticket you write, every life you take, every home you help steal only shows clearly that your soul is for sale inasmuch as you do all these things for money that was created on the BIRTH CERTIFICATE/SOUL BOND rendering you as much a vampire as those you serve.  You are the DEAD, CARRYING OUT THE DEAD.  By your actions, YOU are known.  For more PROOF of this reality pop by http://kateofgaia.wordpress.com It might be an idea to bring a mirror with you to ask yourself WHO YOU REALLY ARE.  It’s time you rose above your “dogs for the elite” status non?